It occured to me, as a viewer, how CNN for over three continuous hours (after which my saturation level was reached) never reflected on the lessons of the events.
Firstly, the American government is *not* invincible. The attack on the Pentagon is the perfect illustration. The airspace is a no-fly zone. Fighters normally should enter in action quickly in the face of strange behaviour. It was my assumption that the plane was leaving or landing at Ronald Reagan airport, where a last minute manoever would be possible. No, it appears that one of the planes took off from Dulles. Who was sleeping at the switch?
Second, only the attack on the Pentagon was necessary to show the US government that it was not invincible. But an attack on the symbol of the WTC gave media oomph to the relative power of such actions.
Third. Four or five suicide attacks involving hijacking US-US bound airplanes means solid planning. Getting the trained pilots to make the suicide attack, knowing the logisitics in order to infiltrate the necessary arms and individuals to carry out the attacks... no small order. And the CIA had no prior wind of this to impede it. Guess who was sleeping at the switch. Certainly not a sign of invincibility or great power...
Four. There are a bunch of chickens running around with their heads chopped off. The "unconfirmed story" about a 747 crashing into the Pentagon (which would have been the second bird with the same target) and that about United worried about certain flights unaccounted for... Come now. One thing for sure is that amongst all the noise, commercial airliners leave a signal. A radar signal. All those flights were certainly accounted for in less time than it takes to write this paragraph. How can intelligent non-partisannews media perpetuate such ridiculous and fear inducing statements is beyond this observer's understanding.
Five. More headless chickens. Yeah right: aircraft carriers to protect NY airspace. What's the point if all commercial traffic was shut down and diverted to Canada? Has it not dawned on decisionmakers that all actions were taken so that they would occur within a 60 minute time span? Doing something similar 48 hours later is highly improbable and would have a lot less impact...
Another thought. The psychological profile of NY. They might rebuild the towers in 2-3 years time. But the 'down' of it all will linger on. NY turned from the state of bankrupcy in the seventies to the go-go years of the nineties. The pendulum is probably going to be swinging on the negative side again for a while.
The real lesson. Towers of clean steel and glass. The images show nothing left but dust. Ashes to ashes. Tell those you love how much magic they mean between those two moments.